![autodesk revit architecture 2010 price autodesk revit architecture 2010 price](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/sGsAAOSw85hf~vMi/s-l500.jpg)
![autodesk revit architecture 2010 price autodesk revit architecture 2010 price](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51g43iQ4-gL._SX218_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_ML2_.jpg)
This beautiful full-color Official Training Guide is the perfect resource for those who need a complete, expert guide to Revit Architecture 2010. And with LT: No way.Learn Revit Architecture 2010 from the source! The coolest graphics an Architect could hope to obtain from their hard work in creating a 3D model. I have just discovered a MAJOR drawback with using Revit LT, at least for my purposes:Īccording to Paul, Revit LT does NOT allow you to do any kind of animations, whatsoever, even in the Cloud on a subscription.Īnimation = walkthroughs and flyarounds. Is MEP mandated to be "in the BIM"? Could that be a negative with LT, since it is not able to be part of a complete BIM package? If not now, what about the future?
![autodesk revit architecture 2010 price autodesk revit architecture 2010 price](https://bimsmithstorage.blob.core.windows.net/news-content/20181019_Autodesk-Revit-BIM-View-Screenshot-BIMsmith-Blog.jpg)
When a BIM is mandated by an owner like the GSA what qualifies? For instance, do they expect there to be a complete civil package in the BIM? Sitework is a glaring weakness of Revit and many firms, I understand, pull the site totally out of the BIM. I am curious if that's true and how well that works. I also under stand that you can "render in the cloud" if you maintain a subscription with LT. I understand that Revit LT is a "one man show" and that you cannot divvy up the model into workgroups. I think if even two products are useful for you like say Revit and AutoCAD, that it ends up being cheaper than individually and you can consider the rest "bonus".Ĭonsider this a "bump" or a "second that motion" post since I, too, am interested in these questions.
#Autodesk revit architecture 2010 price software#
individual products, there is a LOT of software there.
#Autodesk revit architecture 2010 price full#
For a single person firm, or small firm doing projects with only one person on the team, it should work just fine.Īs for the full suite vs.
![autodesk revit architecture 2010 price autodesk revit architecture 2010 price](https://i.pinimg.com/236x/a1/32/8f/a1328f464870fa135fedcb9fe606884e--street-signs-symbols.jpg)
So if you intend to use it in a multi-person firm, it would prove very difficult. However, the most important limitation is that Revit LT does not have work sharing. There are certain in-place features not there as well and it is only architectural and not multi-discipline. Stairs can only use the new component based stairs and not the sketch-based ones. The question is: have any Architect out there used Revit LT and also used full Revit? If so, what are your experiences? Do you believe that paying another $5K or so is worth it to go with the Bldg Des Suite? Or is Revit LT just fine alone? Or how about Revit Architecture? Is that adequate and the Bldg Des Suite overkill? Will we, as Architects ever use all the programs in the entire Suite? It is too much software to learn? Or does it all come with time and prove useful?Įach of the limitation that you mentioned for LT are correct. Also you can't create stairs by the Sketch Mode. I understand that certain things are not included in Revit LT and that AutoDesk has "crippled" the LT version by not included in-software rendering or the ability to create certain in-place features and that you are not supposed to be able to create roof trusses in the LT version. I've seen the AutoDesk comparison tables, but not yet heard from any actual users of Revit LT versus full Revit Architecture or AutoDesk Building Design Suite (which includes Revit all-in-one Architecture-Structure and MEP).